ዕድመ ስልጣን ኢሳያስ ዘምህረና እንተሎ ፣ አገዳስነት ሓባራዊ ውሳነ ንምእባሌ ሓደ ህዝቢ ኣገዳሲ ምዃኑ እዩ።

ሃደ ጋዘጠኛ ኢሬቲቪ፣ ሃደ ጊዜ ስለምንታይ ኣብ ሃገርና ናይ ታኒካ ኮካ ኮላ ዘየለ ኢሉ ምስ ሓተተ፣ ኢሳያስ ድማ ከምዚ እሉ መሊሹ “ሓንቲ ታኒካ ኮካ ኮላ ኣስታት 30 ሳንቲም እያ፣ ክንጥቀመሉን ክንድርብዮን ከለና ድማ ብመሰረቱ 30 ሳንቲም ኢና ንድርቢ ዘለና” ክብል መልሲ ሂቡ። ብቑጠባዊ መዳይ ዝከኣል ከምዘይኮነ ደምዲሙ። ኢሳይያስ ሰባት ንዝተደርበየ ቆርቆሮ ናብ ሓድሽ ኣሉሚንየም መብሰሊ ኣቕሑ ዳግማይ ዕላማ ዝገብሩሉ ቪድዮ እንተዝርእዮ፣ እንታ ምበለ። መልስታቱን ዉሳኔታቱን ካብ ብግቡእ ዝተሰነየ ውሳነታት ዘይኮነስ ካብ ግምት ዝምንጩ ብዝመስለኒ ይዛረብ ከምዝኮነ የርእየካ። እዚ ድማ ዓሚቝ ሕጽረት ክእለቱ የቃልዕ። ዘይከምቲ ኣብ ተመኩሮን ፍልጠትን ዝተመርኮሰ ዝተማህረ ግምታት፣ ናይ ኢሳያስ ግምታት ብሕማቕ ሓበሬታ ዝተደገፈ እዩ ክንብል ንኽእል። ወይ ድማ አብ ኩሉ ኢድካ ካብ መእታው እንተ ተቆጢቡ ምሃሾ ኔሩ።

ነዚ ከስተንትኖ ከለኹ፣ መንግስቲ ኣብ ንእሽቶ ዝመስሉ ግን ከኣ ኣገደስቲ ጉዳያት ዝሃቦ ውሳነታት ስለዝገርመኒ ኢዩ። እዚ ተመሳሳሊ ምኽንያት ናብ ኣገልግሎት ኢንተርነትን ካልኦት ኣገደስቲ ውጽኢታውያን ኣገልግሎታትን ይዝርጋሕ። ኣብ ምዕራባውያን ሃገራት፣ ኢንተርነት ዳርጋ ኣብ ኩሉ ነገር አሎ፣ ካብ ቀረብ ማይን ኤሌክትሪክን ክሳብ ኣገልግሎት ባንክን ፖስታን ዘይነጻጸል እዩ። ይኹን እምበር፣ ኢሳይያስ ብናቱ ተበግሶን ብሓደ ወገን ዝወሰዶ ውሳነ፣ ነታ ሃገር ካብ ከምዚ ዝኣመሰለ ኣገዳሲ ኣገልግሎት ከም እትስእን ገይርዋ ኣሎ። ምናልባት ብንፏኣት ኣማኸርቲ ዝተጸልወ ዉሳኔ ዘይምህላዉን ድሩት ፍልጠቱን ናብዚ ኩነታት ዘብጽሖ ይኸዉን። ሎሚ ግድብን ምሕደራ መስኖን ዝኣመሰሉ ብዘመናዊ ቴክኖሎጂታት በኢንተርኔት ዝመሃደሩሉ ጊዜ ኢዩ።

ፍሉጥ ኣብነት ናይቲ ግጉይ ሓበሬታ ዘለዎ መሪሕነቱ፣ ኣብ ኤርትራ ቀዳም ንግሆ ምስራሕ ኣገዳስነቱ ዝገልጽ ብቴሌቪዥን ዘቕረቦ መደረ እዩ። ንሱ፣ ዝተናውሐ ሰዓታት ስራሕ ጥራይ ዘይኮነስ፣ ውጽኢታዊ ውሳነታት ንምእባሌ ከም ዝድርኽ ከይተረድኦ፣ ነዊሕ ሰዓታት ስራሕ ለውጢ ከምጽእ እዩ ኢሉ ይምጉት ኔሩ።

እቲ ዘገርም ግን ብዙሓት ሰባት ብፍላይ እቶም ብጌጋ ዝርድእዎ ፣ ንኢሳያስ ከም ፈላጥ ይቖጽርዎ ምህላዉ ኢዩ። ይኹን እምበር፣ ድሕሪ ናጽነት ዝወሰዶ ውሳኔታት ምስቲ ኣብ እዋን ብረታዊ ቃልሲ ዝተወስዱ ውሳነታት ብምንጽጻር ምምርማር፣ ዓቢ ፍልልይ ከምዘሎ የርእየካ። ብዘደንቕ ዓወታቱ ዝፍለጥ ህዝባዊ ግንባር ድሕሪ ናጽነት ብሰንኪ ብሕታዊ ምሕደራ ኢሳይያስ ኣብ ድኹም ውሳነታት ወዲቑ ኢዩ።

እምበኣር፣ ኢሳያስ ሓበሬታ ዘይብሉ መራሒ ምዃኑ፣ ብግምት ዘመሓድር ምዃኑ ምፍላጥ ቀሊል እዩ። ነቲ ናይ ቀደም ን ናይ ህጂን ምህደራ ፍልልይ ምረአይ ጥራህ ነቲ ሰኣን ፍልጠቱ የርእየካ። ምስ ናይ ኣብይ ኣሕመድ ዝመሳሰል ኣመራርሓኡ፣ ነቲ ድክመታቱ ዘጉልሕ፣ ብዘይራእዩ ሓይልታት አብ ስልጣን ኮርቻ ኮፍ ዝበለ ሰብ ከምዝኮነ ኢዩ ዘርእየካ። ዕድመ ስልጣን ኢሳያስ ዘምህረና እንተሎ ፣ አገዳስነት ሓባራዊ ውሳነ ንምእባሌ ሓደ ህዝቢ ኣገዳሲ ምዃኑ እዩ።

English

If there’s one lesson from Isayas’s rule, it’s the importance of collective decision-making for a nation’s progress.

When an ERTV journalist asked Isayas why there were no cans of Coca-Cola in Eritrea, he replied, “A can of Coca-Cola costs about 30 cents, and when we use it and throw it away, we are throwing away 30 cents.” Then, he concluded it was not economically feasible. What would he think if Isayas saw people turning discarded cans into new aluminum cookware? His decisions often seem based on assumptions rather than well-informed judgment, showing a lack of expertise.  or it is better to stay away from all kinds of decision-making and only get involved in things you clearly understand.

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/biLvRh5-yRs

This brings to mind the government’s decisions on seemingly small but significant issues. The same flawed reasoning applies to the country’s internet access and other essential utilities. In the West, the Internet is crucial for everything from water and electricity management to banking and postal services. However, Isayas’s unilateral decisions have deprived the country of these important services. His limited knowledge and lack of consultation with experts have led to this situation. Modern technologies manage dams and irrigation systems online, highlighting the internet’s vital role in daily life.

A notable example of his misinformed leadership is his speech on the importance of working on Saturday mornings in Eritrea. He argued that longer working hours would make a difference, not realizing that effective decision-making, not just extended hours, leads to progress.

Ironically, many people, especially those who misunderstand him, consider Isayas a wise man. However, examining post-independence decisions compared to those during the liberation struggle reveals a significant difference. The Eritrean People Liberation Front (EPLF), known for its victories, fell into poor decision-making after independence due to Isayas’s personal rule and single-handed decision-making.

Isayas’s tenure highlights the critical need for collective and informed decision-making. His leadership, characterized by guesswork and lack of expertise, has hindered the nation’s progress. Recognizing the value of collaborative governance is essential for a nation’s advancement.

French

S’il y a une leçon à tirer de la gouvernance d’Isayas, c’est l’importance de la prise de décision collective pour le progrès d’une nation.

Lorsqu’un journaliste d’ERTV a demandé à Isayas pourquoi il n’y avait pas de canettes de Coca-Cola en Érythrée, il a répondu : “Une canette de Coca-Cola coûte environ 30 centimes, et quand nous l’utilisons et la jetons, nous jetons essentiellement 30 centimes.” Ensuite, il a conclu que ce n’était pas économiquement viable. Si Isayas voyait des gens transformer des canettes jetées en nouveaux ustensiles en aluminium, que penserait-il ? Ses décisions semblent souvent basées sur des suppositions plutôt que sur des jugements bien informés, montrant un manque d’expertise. Ou il est préférable de s’abstenir de toute prise de décision et de ne s’impliquer que dans des domaines que l’on comprend clairement.

Cela rappelle les décisions du gouvernement sur des questions apparemment sample mais significatives. Le même raisonnement défectueux s’applique à l’accès à Internet et à d’autres services essentiels dans le pays. En Occident, Internet est crucial pour tout, de la gestion de l’eau et de l’électricité aux services bancaires et postaux. Cependant, les décisions unilatérales d’Isayas ont privé le pays de ces services importants. Ses connaissances limitées et son manque de consultation avec des experts ont conduit à cette situation. Les technologies modernes gèrent les barrages et les systèmes d’irrigation en ligne, soulignant le rôle vital de l’Internet dans la vie quotidienne.

Un exemple notable de sa direction mal informée est son discours sur l’importance de travailler les samedis matins en Érythrée. Il a soutenu que des heures de travail plus longues feraient la différence, sans se rendre compte que c’est une prise de décision efficace, et non simplement des heures prolongées, qui conduit au progrès.

Ironiquement, beaucoup de gens, en particulier ceux qui le comprennent mal, considèrent Isayas comme un homme sage. Cependant, en examinant les décisions prises après l’indépendance par rapport à celles prises pendant la lutte de libération, on constate une différence significative. Le front de libération du peuple érythréen (EPLF), connu pour ses victoires, est tombé dans une mauvaise prise de décision après l’indépendance en raison de la gouvernance personnelle et des décisions unilatérales d’Isayas.

Le mandat d’Isayas met en lumière le besoin crucial d’une prise de décision collective et informée. Son leadership, caractérisé par des conjectures et un manque d’expertise, a freiné le progrès de la nation. Reconnaître la valeur de la gouvernance collaborative est essentiel pour l’avancement d’une nation.

Divora